← Back to Insights
Real Estate & Capital Markets•Feb 20, 2025•Wilson Nyah & Nababinge Catherine

Cultivating Africa's Future: Investing in Agribusiness for Sustainable Development and Economic Prosperity

Cultivating Africa's Future: Investing in Agribusiness for Sustainable Development and Economic Prosperity
[Photo Credit: Photo by Thatselby on Unsplash]

African Fintech Is More Than Apps: Why the Real Opportunities Are Underneath

When people think about fintech in Africa, they think about apps. Mobile wallets, lending apps, money transfer platforms. That’s what users see, and it’s what gets the headlines. It’s also a small part of the actual story.

Embedded image

When I led digital product at Navy Federal Investment Services, I learned quickly that the customer-facing app is only a fraction of the product. The real work happens underneath. The verification of who a user is, the rules that keep the business compliant with regulators, the systems that route trades to the market, the flow of money between accounts, the reporting required by law, the integrations with outside vendors, and the controls that catch fraud and protect the platform when things go wrong. African fintech works the same way, and if anything the infrastructure underneath matters more in African markets than it does in mature ones.

After years of advising on capital deployment across U.S. and African markets, I’ve come to a specific view of where the real opportunities sit. They’re not in the apps everyone is talking about. They’re in the layers underneath, where the right kind of investor (one who can hold the position for years without needing quick returns) has not yet deployed enough capital relative to the structural value being built. This article is for investors, family offices, and business owners who want to understand the system before they put money into it. The goal isn’t to tell you which companies to back. It’s to help you see the market clearly.

Fintech Is Not One Thing: It is a System of Multiple Layers

Most of the noise in fintech commentary comes from treating fintech as a single category. It isn’t. Fintech is a system of multiple layers, each solving a different problem with different economics and different risk levels. Without understanding the layers, evaluating where value is actually being created becomes very difficult.

How a Fintech App Actually Works: The Layers Underneath

A fintech app looks simple on the surface. You open it, sign up, send money, invest, or borrow. Behind that experience, multiple systems are working at the same time. One verifies who you are, another moves your money, another checks for fraud, another keeps the company in compliance with regulations, and another records and reports every transaction. If any one of these breaks, the entire product breaks. That’s why the infrastructure underneath matters, and it’s where most of the lasting value gets built.

The App Layer: The Most Crowded Part of the Market

Consumer fintech apps in Africa attract the most attention for understandable reasons. They have visible user numbers, recognizable brands, and stories that translate well into investor presentations. They’re also one of the most expensive parts of the market to enter and one of the most contested.

A handful of consumer fintech companies in Lagos, Nairobi, Cairo, and Cape Town have absorbed the majority of venture capital flowing into African fintech over the past decade. Valuations (the dollar amounts at which investors purchase shares of the companies) have reflected that competition, and so have the risks. The category has gone through a significant reset in the past few years. Several well-known consumer fintech companies have raised new money at the same valuation as before, or sometimes at lower valuations than they had achieved earlier, which is a sign that earlier valuations were too high relative to the underlying business.

None of this means consumer fintech is uninvestable. It means the app layer has been where capital was most concentrated and where pricing was least favorable for new entrants. Infrastructure attracts capital too, but historically less of it, and from a different kind of investor with a longer time horizon. That gap is where disciplined long-hold capital can find better entry points than the headlines suggest. If you’re looking for uneven opportunities, where the upside is meaningful relative to what most of the market has bid up, you have to look somewhere other than where the consumer-app race is being run.

The Five Layers Investors Should Understand

This is a simple way to think about the African fintech system.

1. Payment Rails: How Money Actually Moves

This is the layer that lets businesses accept cards, bank transfers, and mobile money. Mobile money is a system where people send and receive money through their phones, often without needing a bank account. It’s foundational in much of Africa, where many people don’t have traditional bank accounts but most have mobile phones.

In Africa, payment rails are more complicated than they sound because each country has its own mobile money providers. In one country it might be MTN, Orange or both, in another Airtel or Safaricom and sometimes all four. Building separate connections to each is time-consuming and expensive, so businesses rely on platforms that aggregate these connections into a single integration point and charge a small percentage on each transaction. The layer is visible and competitive. Companies that win it become embedded in the daily commerce of multiple countries, but reaching that scale is hard and the competition includes global players.

2. Identity and Compliance: Knowing Who the User Is

Before any financial transaction can happen, there’s one fundamental question: who is the user? This is where KYC (Know Your Customer) comes in. KYC isn’t just technical. It’s a regulatory requirement. Governments require financial companies to verify identity before allowing anyone to open an account, move money, or access credit. Without it, the system can’t protect itself from money laundering, fraud, and worse.

There’s however a balance to manage. If the verification process is too strict, users abandon it. If it’s too loose, the platform exposes itself to serious risk. Specialized platforms have emerged to solve this, using document verification, facial recognition, and database checks to confirm that a person is who they claim to be. This layer sits at the intersection of trust, regulation, and user experience.

The companies that build defensible position in this layer, meaning competitive advantages that protect them from being copied, are typically those with two specific things. The first is proprietary data assets, the unique customer and verification data they have accumulated over time that competitors can’t easily replicate. The second is established regulatory relationships, the trust they’ve built with national regulators that takes years to develop. Companies that have these are positioned for real durability. The pure technology side of identity verification is becoming widely available as AI-driven document and biometric tools spread, which means investors evaluating this layer should pay close attention to what specifically protects a given company from being copied by competitors.

3. Data and Connectivity: Who Owns the Customer Data

Banks have traditionally held customer data and controlled access to it. Your transaction history stayed inside the bank, but Open banking is changing that. Open banking is a system where banks share customer financial data with other authorized companies through secure software connections called APIs (application programming interfaces, which are essentially the technical pipes that let different software systems communicate with each other), but only with the customer’s consent.

The U.K. pioneered this model after a 2016 regulatory order. The European Union built it into law through a regulation called PSD2 in 2018. In the U.S., companies like Plaid built the technical infrastructure that powers apps like Venmo, Robinhood, and most modern fintech products. The U.S. and European trajectories are useful reference points but don’t transfer directly to Africa. The underlying banking infrastructure is different, the regulatory frameworks are at different stages, and the path to scale will look different.

Nigeria became the first African country to issue a full open banking framework, with implementation rolling out in 2025. Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, and Rwanda are at various stages of developing their own. This matters in Africa because many people don’t have formal credit histories. Instead of relying on traditional credit scores, fintech companies can analyze transaction patterns and income flows to understand users more accurately. The layer is early enough that the platforms that win it can capture value from everything built on top, though the question of what protects winning platforms from competitors is less certain than it appears, and there’s real pressure from larger platforms that could absorb the layer over time.

4. Credit Infrastructure: Making Lending Possible

Lending is one of the most important areas in fintech and one of the most complex. In many African markets, formal collateral is rare and traditional credit histories are limited or nonexistent, which makes it hard for banks to assess risk using conventional methods.

A different kind of infrastructure has emerged in response. Platforms that help institutions analyze alternative data, automate credit decisions, and manage loan portfolios. They support consumer loans, working capital for small businesses, and savings-linked credit products. The layer plays a major role in expanding access to finance.

But lending isn’t just about giving money. It’s about getting it back. The investment risk here is execution and credit performance, not market size. A platform that lends well makes money. A platform that lends badly loses it. The difference is in the underwriting (the process of deciding which borrowers to lend to and on what terms), the data, and the operational discipline of the team running the business.

5. Core Banking and Embedded Finance: The Engine Behind the Product

Some companies go deeper into the system and provide the backend infrastructure that powers financial products themselves. Account management, transaction processing, ledgers, reporting. These platforms allow startups to launch financial services without building an entire banking system from scratch, and they let non-financial companies (logistics firms, retailers, mobile operators) embed banking services into their own products.

Embedded finance is the term for this trend, where financial services get built into apps and businesses that aren’t traditionally financial. The category is one of the fastest-growing areas in global fintech, and Africa is no exception. For investors, the opportunity is in identifying the platforms that will power this shift across the continent rather than picking which embedded product will win in any single industry.

Two Structural Challenges Worth Naming

Before any framework about African fintech infrastructure is useful, two structural realities have to be acknowledged.

The first is currency risk. African fintech revenues are predominantly in local currencies that have lost significant value against the U.S. dollar over the past decade. A company growing thirty percent in Nigerian naira terms may be flat or shrinking when measured in dollars. Foreign investors evaluating any African fintech opportunity have to think about currency exposure as part of the underlying thesis, not as an afterthought.

The second is the amount of money these businesses need and the time they take. African fintech infrastructure businesses require large amounts of capital to build and have long paths to profitability. Many require sustained venture funding for five to seven years before reaching meaningful scale. The right investor for this space is one who can hold the position for years without needing quick liquidity, not one who needs the money back in a short time frame.

Neither of these challenges invalidates the opportunity. They just frame what disciplined deployment of capital looks like in this market.

Why This Framework Matters: Evaluating Companies Layer by Layer

Once you understand the layers, the questions you ask about any given company change. Which layer is it actually operating in? How critical is that layer to the rest of the system? What protects the business from competitors, and against whom? These are different questions with different answers, and treating “African fintech” as a single category leads to capital decisions that don’t reflect what’s actually being purchased.

Where the Real Opportunities Are: The Layers Underneath the Apps

The most interesting opportunities in African fintech aren’t in the consumer apps. They’re in specific parts of the layers underneath, where defensible data, regulatory positioning, and serious operational capability come together.

Identity and compliance providers with real proprietary data assets are one such pocket. Credit infrastructure with disciplined risk management is another. Core banking and embedded finance platforms with strong relationships across multiple operators are a third. These pockets are less crowded by the kind of long-hold capital African fintech actually needs. They’re more defensible where the specific company has done the work to build a real competitive advantage rather than relying on broad category claims. And they’re more directly tied to the structural problems African economies need to solve.

The investors who can evaluate companies layer by layer rather than headline by headline, and who can hold through African market cycles, will deploy capital more effectively than those chasing whichever consumer app is trending in any given quarter.

What’s Next

In the next article, I’ll walk through the companies operating in each of these five layers based on how they publicly position themselves and what they describe as their core business. The goal is to give you a practical map of who is building what across Africa.

If you’re evaluating exposure to African fintech, or thinking through how to structure capital deployment across U.S. and African markets, I’d welcome a conversation.

Wilson Ningamai Nyah is the Founder and CEO of Nyanu Investment Services, a Washington, D.C.-based investment and advisory platform focused on disciplined capital deployment across U.S. and African markets. He previously led digital product at Navy Federal Investment Services and helped build a digital investing platform serving over 100,000 users and managing over $200 million in invested assets.

This material is provided for informational and strategic discussion purposes only. Nyanu Investment Services does not provide legal, tax, or accounting advice, does not take custody of client funds, and does not operate as a broker-dealer. Prospective investors should consult their legal, tax, and financial advisors before making investment decisions.